Jump to content


New START treaty talks. I predict lots of posturing and little action.


1 reply to this topic

#1 George Rowell

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1171 posts
  • LocationIn Perth now

Posted 31 July 2020 - 11:26 PM

Maybe the World has moved on and the whole idea is no longer relevant. I think it is dead yet with an election coming up it may be used to score a few political points. Any serious dialog I doubt. Without China participating, an agreement limiting anything will only be seen as a hinderance .

https://www.usnews.c...clear-arms-deal


A doctor knows a little about a lot. A specialist knows a lot about a little. In time the doctor knows less and less about more and more and the specialist knows more and more about less and less until ultimately the doctor knows nothing about everything and the specialist knows everything about nothing.

#2 LFC

    Fiscal Conservative

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35615 posts
  • LocationPennsylvania

Posted 01 August 2020 - 06:43 PM

 George Rowell, on 31 July 2020 - 11:26 PM, said:

Without China participating, an agreement limiting anything will only be seen as a hinderance .

Putin asked Trump to park it so it sounds like the 3 largest nuclear powers are out.
" 'Individual conscience' means that women only get contraceptives if their employers, their physicians, their pharmacists, their husbands and/or fathers, pastors, and possibly their mayors, Governors, State Secretaries of Health, Congressmen, Senators, and President all agree that in that particular case they're justifiable." --D.C. Sessions

"That's the problem with being implacable foes - no one has any incentive to treat you as anything more than an obstacle to be overcome."

"The 'Road to Serfdom' is really all right turns." --Progressive Whisperer

""The GOP ... where every accusation is also a confession." --Progressive Whisperer





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users