Jump to content


The INF Treaty is history


72 replies to this topic

#61 George Rowell

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 507 posts
  • LocationIn Perth now

Posted 11 February 2019 - 12:38 AM

View Postindy, on 10 February 2019 - 07:02 AM, said:

And this squares with Crimea and Ukraine how? What the Russian military may or may not understand regarding their own capabilities and limitations in the 'event of a prolonged conflict with an adversary' has little to nothing to do with the ambitions, aggression, or desires of the man who tells them what to do and when to do it unchecked by any oversight or safeguards. The problem with Russia is the structure of their civilian government, and in particular the man who runs the military, not the military itself.
Putin is very considered with his approach, a tactician. He is never impulsive bad mouthed or clueless and never tweets. The problem with America is the structure of the civilian government that allows lobbyists from the MIC, AIPAC and others undue influence. If you removed lobbyists and limited election funding then American government be nigh on perfect. God, I wish that was the case. That would MAGA.

As it is the political process has been shanghaied by special interests. Many studies show the American political process is influenced by lobbyists, the mega rich and large corporations in that order, with organized labor and citizens having no effect whatsoever.
https://www.cambridg...4D4893B382B992B

People talk about assassinations in Russia, like one of Putin's political opponents getting gunned down walking near the Kremlin. That Putin ordered that does not pass even an elementary quality check for me. There are hundreds of political groups and mobsters in the Ukraine and Russia, and it is awash with CIA/DIA money too. Victoria Nuland said State spent 5 billion promoting democracy there. J-CA and I went into some detail with this one, J-CA claiming it was all/mostly legit. I certainly do not want to get into that again but 5 billion is a lot of money trickling down and these anti-Russian mobs have their hands out.

Posted Image
A doctor knows a little about a lot. A specialist knows a lot about a little. In time the doctor knows less and less about more and more and the specialist knows more and more about less and less until ultimately the doctor knows nothing about everything and the specialist knows everything about nothing.

#62 baw1064

    formerly of the public sector

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4571 posts
  • LocationEarthquakes, tsunamis, and volcanos--oh my!

Posted 11 February 2019 - 12:48 AM

I'd be more likely to believe you if there were also instances of Putin's allies dying under suspicious circumstances. But I can't think of any off hand. So while correlation doesn't prove causality, an amount of correlation which is statistically implausible under the null hypothesis and doesn't bear any good alternative explanations, is "interesting".
“Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” --Dr. Seuss

#63 George Rowell

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 507 posts
  • LocationIn Perth now

Posted 11 February 2019 - 01:05 AM

View Postbaw1064, on 11 February 2019 - 12:48 AM, said:

I'd be more likely to believe you if there were also instances of Putin's allies dying under suspicious circumstances. But I can't think of any off hand. So while correlation doesn't prove causality, an amount of correlation which is statistically implausible under the null hypothesis and doesn't bear any good alternative explanations, is "interesting".
Why would the DIA pay for Putin's allies to be hit? That would be counter productive.
A doctor knows a little about a lot. A specialist knows a lot about a little. In time the doctor knows less and less about more and more and the specialist knows more and more about less and less until ultimately the doctor knows nothing about everything and the specialist knows everything about nothing.

#64 George Rowell

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 507 posts
  • LocationIn Perth now

Posted 11 February 2019 - 01:39 AM

I believe limiting special interests would MAGA, very quickly, but we are drifting off-topic here. China is the key to the US and Russia leaving the INF. I think the US and Russia are on the same page and disagreement is for show only. Russia recently invited all concerned parties to a demonstration showing that the 9M729 missile complies to the INF. Nobody from Nato turned up. The Russians point out that the 9M729 missile is based on a previous missile that is in accordance with the treaty, it only has a few extra percent of fuel to compensate for a much heavier navigation system. I believe it too!

That nobody of importance turned up shows that whether the (9M729 is in compliance or not is immaterial. The worst case is NATO prove it is in compliance! I doubt Russia and the US want that. It is a facade. If anybody was serious they would have gone there. So Russia remains in 'noble' compliance and the States and NATO are not forced to agree. That is what they both want. The key is minimizing the fears of the American and Chinese public. NATO and Beijing know what is really happening. Beijing have played 3 kingdoms games for centuries. Everybody is playing games for Joe public.
A doctor knows a little about a lot. A specialist knows a lot about a little. In time the doctor knows less and less about more and more and the specialist knows more and more about less and less until ultimately the doctor knows nothing about everything and the specialist knows everything about nothing.

#65 D. C. Sessions

    I don't have to pretend to be an adult any more

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 8948 posts
  • LocationCentral New Mexico

Posted 11 February 2019 - 07:27 AM

View PostHockeyDon, on 10 February 2019 - 12:09 PM, said:

This is ignoring Putin's typical behavior during his own elections, where his people are blatant about stuffing the ballot boxes in plain sight. There have been enough reports of this that it shouldn't be a surprise the Crimea vote went about the same way.

The surprise was that joining Russia got only 93% of the vote, instead of the usual 100%-plus.
"Robots aren't the problem. Capitalism is." -- Last words of Stephen Hawking.
These days, "libertarian" is just a euphemism for a Nazi who's afraid to commit.
"If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention." -- Heather Heyer
"I'd rather have my child, but by golly, if I gotta give her up, we're gonna make it count." -- Her mother
"Your purpose, then, plainly stated, is that you will destroy the Government, unless you be allowed to construe and enforce the Constitution as you please, on all points in dispute between you and us. You will rule or ruin in all events." -- some RINO

#66 D. C. Sessions

    I don't have to pretend to be an adult any more

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 8948 posts
  • LocationCentral New Mexico

Posted 11 February 2019 - 07:30 AM

View PostGeorge Rowell, on 10 February 2019 - 10:30 PM, said:

Sir Isaac Newtons V*V/R, ω *ω * R I actually remembered that stuff, like 55 years ago.

That's centripedal force. The angular momentum is ωmr2 . Since it's conserved, the angular velocity drops off as the square of radius.
"Robots aren't the problem. Capitalism is." -- Last words of Stephen Hawking.
These days, "libertarian" is just a euphemism for a Nazi who's afraid to commit.
"If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention." -- Heather Heyer
"I'd rather have my child, but by golly, if I gotta give her up, we're gonna make it count." -- Her mother
"Your purpose, then, plainly stated, is that you will destroy the Government, unless you be allowed to construe and enforce the Constitution as you please, on all points in dispute between you and us. You will rule or ruin in all events." -- some RINO

#67 indy

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9065 posts

Posted 11 February 2019 - 07:49 AM

The practical effect, as far as I understand it, is that missiles fired westward will have less initial inertial velocity and an increased flight angle as compared to those fired eastward (assuming constant fuel capacity and target distance). The shorter the distance to the target, the more you must increase the flight angle. So, firing from Russia toward Eastern Europe will result in a very steep flight angle.

#68 indy

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9065 posts

Posted 11 February 2019 - 07:57 AM

View PostGeorge Rowell, on 10 February 2019 - 10:18 PM, said:

That a fact? Of course if they took the independent route then they would be free to join the Ukraine in theory anyway. Russia has far too much to lose if the Crimea became hostile to let that happen, come sanctions, war or pestilence.

The vote was always predetermined and would have gone Russia's way even without the vote rigging. A large population of Crimea are Russian pensioners, whose pensions were explicitly threatened if the vote was for anything except 'join Russia'.

#69 George Rowell

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 507 posts
  • LocationIn Perth now

Posted 11 February 2019 - 08:09 AM

View Postindy, on 10 February 2019 - 12:36 PM, said:

I'm still waiting on the punch line to drop in this theory. If one accepted your premise that it's the CIA or whatever killing off Russians, not only in Russia proper, but around the globe, in order to make Putin look bad, what is the purpose? Winning a propaganda war isn't an end, it's a means to an end. If, by your own hand, you slice the throat of everybody and anybody who might succeed Putin, where does it lead? What's the point of making him look bad? Who is benefiting and why?
Come on Indy. We are in a propaganda war to win hearts and minds. Perhaps you think we aren't. Propaganda lets government control people and lets lobbies control the government. Boeing alone are in for 1.5 Trillion tax payers money for the F35. The so called cold war-dividend sent arms sales spiraling down. The MIC did not like that at all, it thrives on hate. Now propaganda is centered on Russia but the real motive is to develop arms to counter China. I think Moscow understands this. It is a three kingdoms scenario.
A doctor knows a little about a lot. A specialist knows a lot about a little. In time the doctor knows less and less about more and more and the specialist knows more and more about less and less until ultimately the doctor knows nothing about everything and the specialist knows everything about nothing.

#70 George Rowell

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 507 posts
  • LocationIn Perth now

Posted 11 February 2019 - 08:10 AM

View PostD. C. Sessions, on 11 February 2019 - 07:27 AM, said:

The surprise was that joining Russia got only 93% of the vote, instead of the usual 100%-plus.
Won't happen again.
A doctor knows a little about a lot. A specialist knows a lot about a little. In time the doctor knows less and less about more and more and the specialist knows more and more about less and less until ultimately the doctor knows nothing about everything and the specialist knows everything about nothing.

#71 George Rowell

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 507 posts
  • LocationIn Perth now

Posted 11 February 2019 - 08:16 AM

View PostD. C. Sessions, on 11 February 2019 - 07:30 AM, said:

That's centripedal force. The angular momentum is ωmr2 . Since it's conserved, the angular velocity drops off as the square of radius.
Yep, your right :) :) Ice skaters!
A doctor knows a little about a lot. A specialist knows a lot about a little. In time the doctor knows less and less about more and more and the specialist knows more and more about less and less until ultimately the doctor knows nothing about everything and the specialist knows everything about nothing.

#72 George Rowell

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 507 posts
  • LocationIn Perth now

Posted 11 February 2019 - 08:58 AM

View PostD. C. Sessions, on 11 February 2019 - 07:30 AM, said:

That's centripedal force. The angular momentum is ωmr2 . Since it's conserved, the angular velocity drops off as the square of radius.
Angular velocity * moment of inertia.

I had forgotten about angular momentum, just looked it up. Shit. I need to get a part time teaching job, remember quick that way. I did that once before for a friends daughter who wanted to go to uni. Had a great few months and it brought me back to scratch for the basic stuff.
A doctor knows a little about a lot. A specialist knows a lot about a little. In time the doctor knows less and less about more and more and the specialist knows more and more about less and less until ultimately the doctor knows nothing about everything and the specialist knows everything about nothing.

#73 Traveler

    Rambling Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 12711 posts
  • LocationPhilly Area

Posted 11 February 2019 - 11:35 AM

View PostD. C. Sessions, on 10 February 2019 - 02:38 PM, said:

I starts with the angular momentum of the surface. The the higher you are the less the same angular momentum translates into in terms of angular velocity, so you fall behind. It's actually an effect large enough to make a difference even for the little ones they launch down the road at White Sands (pretty easy to calculate, actually.)
That makes sense. angular velocity would have to increase to keep up. Forgot about that. Duh. Its nice to be able to be stupid here. And get edumacated.
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened."-- Winston Churchill
"Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices" Voltaire





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users